View video
  • 3 hours ago
  • 26418
View photo
  • 3 hours ago
  • 41426
View photo
  • 3 hours ago
  • 263
View photo
  • 3 hours ago
  • 825
View photo
  • 3 hours ago
  • 20174
View photo
  • 3 hours ago
  • 414198
View photo
  • 3 hours ago
  • 21369
View photo
  • 3 hours ago
  • 407
View photo
  • 3 hours ago
  • 338
View photo
  • 5 hours ago
  • 9732
View photo
  • 5 hours ago
  • 1569

I asked my ex, now good friend, if she would ever have an open relationship and she said, “No, I don’t think I could do that” then after a pause and a smile, “but what about love affair friendships?” She went on to describe an impenetrable fortress of female friendship, her own group of best mates who’d known each other since school and had supported and loved each other through almost all of their lifetimes. They sounded far more bonded to, and in love with one another, than their respective husbands. It struck me that we don’t have the language to reflect the diversity and breadth of connections we experience. Why is sex the thing we tend to define a relationship by, when in fact it can be simple casual fun without a deep emotional transaction? Why do we say “just friends” when, for some of us, a friendship goes deeper? Can we define a new currency of commitment that celebrates and values this? Instead of having multiple confusing interpretations of the same word, could we have different words? What if we viewed our relationships as a pyramid structure with our primary partner at the top and a host of lovers, friends, spiritual soul mates, colleagues, and acquaintances beneath that?

Rosie Wilby, “You’re More Polyamorous Than You Think” (via sodisarmingdarling)

To all my fav gal & guy pals.

(via hotpinknailpolish)
View quote
  • 14 hours ago
  • 13788
View photo
  • 1 day ago
  • 3770
View photo
  • 1 day ago
  • 34316
View photo
  • 1 day ago
  • 12789
x